advert

Bush decides children are expendable, also delicious

Oct05

by

Here’s one promise the president kept: on Wednesday President Bush vetoed the funding bill for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), just as he said he would. As a direct result of his actions, almost seven million children will lose insurance coverage in one month, and millions more won’t receive coverage to begin with.
I’ve written about this issue twice before, and here I am, covering it again. God, Alice, could you find something new to write about? When our President values the health of our children over war spending, I’ll cover it. Then I’ll write a gleeful addendum about the donkeys that subsequently flew out of his butt. (I’m mature!)
Truly, though, this decision is staggering. In vetoing this bill, President Bush disregarded its overwhelming support by both parties, not to mention the American public.
So why the veto? According to Bush, we should not bother insuring small children,because “their humours are oft times balanced and need not the poultices and purging methods given by doctors of physic; and besides, their meat is the tenderest, and maketh the most nourishing of stewes.”
Seriously! The Bush administration reportedly is afeared that the expansion of SCHIP moves it toward that most unspeakable of taboos: the dread Government Run Insurance Program (AAIIIIIIIEEEE!). His speech given in Lancaster, Pennsylvania on the day of the veto distorts the original intent of the bill as well as its expansion. For one, he characterized the bill as redundant, implying that it’s for poor children when “poor children in America are covered by what’s called Medicaid.” In fact, SCHIP was specifically created to cover the ever-increasing population of families who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid and too little to payfor regular (exorbitant) rates of health insurance. He added: “This program expands coverage, federal coverage up to families earning $83,000 a year. That doesn’t sound poor to me.”
Actually, according to NPR, in this excellent primer on SCHIP, he’s referring to New York (where all the troublemakers live), where officials pushed to include children in families with incomes up to four times the poverty level onto the program. (In New York, not coincidentally, insurance rates are among the highest in the nation.) “The Department of Health and Human Services rejected New York’s plan last month, and under the bill, that denial would stand.”
And that’s not the only distortion that George Bush shared with the crowd in Lancaster. He also told them, “I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system.” Implying, of course, that SCHIP equals a government-run insurance program. In fact, SCHIP has nothing to do with the federal government running the healthcare system; SCHIP provides families with affordable healthcare options that are offered (with the help of SCHIP funding) by private companies. As Senator Charles E. Grassley, an Iowa Republican who helped write the bill, said, “Screaming ‘socialized medicine’ is like shouting ‘fire’ in a crowded theater. It is intended to cause hysteria that diverts people from reading the bill, looking at the facts.”
In response to the president’s veto, the Democrats unleashed heart-tugging hell: Graeme Frost, a sweet-voiced twelve-year-old who was gravely injured in a severe car accident, delivered the radio address. Thanks to SCHIP, Graeme and his sister received the care they needed to recover. “I don’t know why President Bush wants to stop kids who really need help from getting CHIP,” said Graeme. “All I know is I have some really good doctors. They took great care of me when I was sick, and I’m glad I could see them because of the Children’s Health Program.” I feel a little conflicted about the decision to have a child provide the response to the veto. On the one (obvious) hand, it’s transparently manipulative (I confess that just Graeme’s voice, which had been affected by the accident—his vocal cords were injured—got me a little choked up); on the other (also obvious) hand, this veto directly and profoundly impacts children, so why shouldn’t a child respond?
A House override vote on the veto is scheduled for the week of October 15th. Meanwhile, Democrats will continue their efforts to influence the fifteen Republicans they need to overturn the veto. Interested in helping them change some minds? Well, then, here’s a petition for you.

About the author

Alice Bradley

http://www.finslippy.com
Alice Bradley was a regular contributor to Alpha Mom, writing about current events as they related to parenting. You can read about her daily life at her personal blog, Finslippy.


Subscribe to posts by Alice Bradley

7 Responses to “Bush decides children are expendable, also delicious”

  1. Matt Oct 06 at 8:06 pm Reply Reply

    Petition sent. Also, another $250 contribution to the Senate Democratic Campaign. Mr. Bush is wrong on so many levels about this and many issues related to health care in this country. We must elect both a President and a Congress who understand the real pain and suffering people in the US are absorbing in attempting to provide themselves and their families decent health care. Thanks for not giving up on this important issue.

  2. Macombbob Oct 07 at 6:33 pm Reply Reply

    I shed a tear for Graeme Frost also. But not because he needs federal health insurance, but rather because his wealthy liberal patents do not care enough about him to buy insurance. The dems cry his parents only make $45,000 a year, but this is a fraud. Records, linked at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1907687/posts show his parent to be extremely wealthy individluals how choose not to protect their children. For example, these “$45,000″ patents, have their own business and own multiple properties worth approximately $1,000,000 and paid $40,000 annual tuition to a private school for two of their children. Perhaps if they would mix with us poor folk in public schools, they could protect their kids.

  3. dregina Oct 09 at 9:18 am Reply Reply

    I love you, Alice.

  4. JennyM Oct 09 at 9:21 am Reply Reply

    Huh.
    It’s frightening, isn’t it? I think my head just exploded. Again.
    Anyway, thanks for continuing to pursue this issue, Alice, which, again, has notable bipartisan support and overwhelming support from the general public.

  5. JennyM Oct 09 at 11:00 am Reply Reply

    Also, this is an interesting response, with backup, to the claims that the Frost family is somehow taking unfair advantage of the SCHIP program.
    http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/13165.html
    Since when is that kind of response ok?
    I’ll crawl back in my lurker hole now.

  6. kym b Oct 12 at 7:06 pm Reply Reply

    Thank you, I signed the petition and also sent a letter to my Congressman…..who I didn’t vote for.

  7. All Adither Oct 17 at 11:45 pm Reply Reply

    I was trying to explain to my four-year-old who The President is and what he does. All I could come up with was. “He runs the country. But he’s a jerk and not many people like him.”
    I really wanted to say, “He screws over poor children”. I didn’t think, though, my tot would get that the way I wanted him too.

Like us on Facebook

Close